Princess Anne’s daughter, Zara Tindall, is the first royal woman in over 50 years to welcome a child at home rather than in a hospital.
Zara, who married former England rugby player Mike Tindall, revived the royal tradition of home births after her second child, Lucas, was born on the bathroom floor of the family’s Gatcombe Park house in March 2021.
On an episode of the “The Good, The Bad & The Rugby” podcast, Mike announced, “Sunday got even better because a little baby boy arrived at my house.” Mike added that the baby “arrived very quickly.”
“Fortunately, the midwife who was going to meet us at the hospital wasn’t that far away so she drove up just as we had assumed the [position] and the second midwife arrived just after the head had arrived,” Mike said.
While Lucas’s birth may have been a last-minute accident, babies were typically born in palaces and residences for most of British royal history. Known by the euphemism “confinement,” historian Carolyn Harris says that royal mothers would disappear from the public eye a month before giving birth, as reported by the Times.
The last royal family member to give birth at home was Princess Margaret, the late Queen’s sister, who gave birth to Lady Sarah at Kensington Palace in 1964. Queen Elizabeth II also had four children born at home, either at Buckingham Palace or Clarence House.
“The best thing about being at home, the best thing was, as soon as he’s wrapped up, he’s skin on skin, straight downstairs. TV room. Golf on. This is what we’re doing,” Mike said about the pros of having an at-home birth.
While childbirth is often a very private experience these days, some royal women had to give birth in public after a fake news crisis had massive geopolitical consequences. King James II was rumored to sneak a baby perish after birth and sneak a replacement baby in a warming pan. This incredible disinformation campaign is one of the big factors that led to the so-called Glorious Revolution in 1688,” Lucy Worsley, Chief Curator at Historic Royal Palaces, says (via the Times).
It was the birth of King Charles in 1948 that changed the tradition again. “Until the birth of [King] Charles, the Home Secretary had to be on hand for the births of direct heirs to the throne,” says Harris, “but it had already been made clear that the Home Secretary didn’t have to be present for people further down the line of succession.”